Website: Luxury Residential Technology Firm

My Role: Research, Design, Implementation

Research - competitive analysis, research design, interviews, user journey analysis, insight generation & application

Design - Information architecture, mockups, prototypes, user testing

Implementation - basic design of the final product, except for final QA/QC by senior graphic designer

Target Audience:

  • Architects, Builders, Interior Designers, & Clients

  • Bozeman & Big Sky Area

  • Ages 45-60, All Genders, All Nationalities

Research Conducted

Method: Direct Interview

Participants were chosen based on the characteristics that matched the various target audience profiles. Direct interviews were chosen because there is a very small pool of relevant participants, and each one had either heard of or worked with the company before due to the size of the population compared to the size of the firm.

If participants were already involved with the firm, they were asked to report on the value they found in working with the firm.

Then, both types of participants were asked questions to help determine the following:

  • what they looked for when consulting websites of potential partners

  • what was most appealing for them to see

  • what stage of the consumer journey they were in when they went searching for the website initially.

Design Strategy

The main reason that people searched for the website was that they wanted to understand what the firm did, how it was done, and what they could expect when working with the company.

The original website was found to be cluttered by those who had used it. Thus, it had to be simple. This led to the consolidation of many pages into two primary information pages: Process & Results.

The site was also not engaging or stimulating, leading to the creation of several new assets, including videos and motion graphics.

This led to the refinement of the process & results pages, which in turn led to a reorganization of the entire website around a story into which any user could place themselves.

User Testing & Results

The website testing consisted of asking several users (interior designer, architect, builder & client) to find something inspiring on the site, something that proved the company’s value to them, and then to find a way to call the company.

Conclusion:

Using an existing set of pages, with the requirement that these pages stay intact, was the most challenging part of the website design process. The simplification of the site required the aggregation and categorization of all web elements into groups that satisfy user intent, but with the addition of several more engaging elements and the implementation of a brand story that aligned with user intent, the site was reshaped into an effective vehicle for company information in a way that engaged the target audience segments with what they wanted to see.

For similar projects (moving forward), the best-case scenario would make use of a broader pool of research participants, but financial constraints within the scope of this project did not allow for that. Additionally, the amount of material that the company required be kept on the website seemed superfluous to me, but this was a learning opportunity that allowed me to blend my design philosophy with that of the client and helped me learn to work with small teams and demanding clients.